Close Menu
    2digital.news2digital.news
    • News
    • Analytics
    • Interviews
    • About us
    • Editorial board
    2digital.news2digital.news
    Home»News»Wikipedia Wants Fairness — and Compensation — for the Data That Trained Artificial Intelligence
    News

    Wikipedia Wants Fairness — and Compensation — for the Data That Trained Artificial Intelligence

    November 13, 20252 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter

    It’s no secret that the “knowledge” behind modern AI tools exists largely thanks to open and free sources like Wikipedia. The Wikimedia Foundation emphasized that the development of large language models (LLMs) would not have been possible without access to open knowledge bases. Data from Wikipedia has been a core component in the training datasets of systems such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot. At the same time, the organization points out that the intense use of its resources by bots and crawlers has significantly increased server loads — with up to 65% of Wikipedia’s web traffic now coming from AI-generated requests.

    Wikimedia is urging AI developers to respect the same principles of openness that they themselves benefit from — by implementing mandatory attribution (clear source citations) and paid licenses that would help sustain projects like Wikipedia. As the Foundation noted in its statement, without reliable, human-curated sources of knowledge, artificial intelligence risks becoming a closed system, endlessly repeating its own errors and trapped in a feedback loop of misinformation.

    The Foundation’s proposal reflects a growing global dispute between content creators and AI companies. Similar actions have already been taken by The New York Times, Reuters, and Axel Springer, which are demanding compensation from companies like OpenAI for using their editorial materials to train generative models.

    However, the case of Wikipedia is fundamentally different — it’s not a profit-driven corporation, but a community of volunteers maintaining an open ecosystem of knowledge. Introducing a compensation model for Wikipedia’s data could therefore set a powerful precedent, forcing other tech companies to rethink how they use the sources that fuel their models.

    If the Wikimedia Foundation succeeds in achieving even part of what it demands, it would mark an important step toward fair cooperation between content creators and the AI industry — which, for now, continues to rely on their work mostly without paying for it. One thing is certain: without access to Wikipedia, every chatbot would lose a huge part of its capabilities.

    Share. Twitter LinkedIn
    Avatar photo
    Mikolaj Laszkiewicz

    An experienced journalist and editor passionate about new technologies, computers, and scientific discoveries. He strives to bring a unique perspective to every topic. A law graduate.

    Related Posts

    News

    U.S. imposes steep tariffs on Nvidia and AMD chips exported to China. A major blow to China’s AI sector

    January 16, 2026
    News

    Global disparities in AI adoption may deepen economic inequalities, Anthropic report finds

    January 16, 2026
    News

    European Union Introduces Mandatory Monitoring of “Forever Chemicals” in Drinking Water – New Rules Now in Force

    January 15, 2026
    Read more

    «Not a ranking, but an X-ray»: How the IMF Measures Countries’ Readiness for AI

    January 8, 2026

    Why Employers Need Women’s Health Programs

    January 7, 2026

    Personalized medicine – how far can we go with precision medicine

    January 2, 2026
    Stay in touch
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
    • News
    • Analytics
    • Interviews
    • About us
    • Editorial board
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.