Close Menu
    2digital.news2digital.news
    • News
    • Analytics
    • Interviews
    • About us
    • Editorial board
    • Events
    2digital.news2digital.news
    Home»News»Morgan Freeman Fights Back Against AI Voice Cloning — and He’s Right
    News

    Morgan Freeman Fights Back Against AI Voice Cloning — and He’s Right

    Mikolaj LaszkiewiczBy Mikolaj LaszkiewiczNovember 14, 20252 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter Threads Reddit
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn Threads Reddit

    Thanks to artificial intelligence, it’s now possible to “revive” deceased actors on screen or alter the voices of living performers. These tools can be extremely useful, allowing filmmakers to precisely tailor productions to audience expectations. But the accessibility of such technology also has a darker side — something the acclaimed actor has experienced firsthand.

    Freeman admitted in media interviews that many AI companies are generating audio with his voice without obtaining consent. “My legal team has a lot, a lot of work,” the actor said.

    Freeman stresses that his voice is not only a recognizable trait but also a source of income: “I don’t appreciate it and I get paid for doing stuff like that, so if you’re gonna do it without me, you’re robbing me,” he said, clearly frustrated. His lawyers have already identified “quite a few” instances of synthetic audio systems using his vocal likeness.

    The actor also points to the broader threat posed by rapidly advancing voice technologies. Without proper regulations, AI could increasingly imitate well-known personalities, undermining job markets for actors and voice-over professionals. He also criticizes so-called “AI actresses,” such as the virtual “Tilly Norwood,” whose voice is attributed to computer-generated productions — warning that this sets a dangerous precedent.

    Freeman joins a growing group of actors pushing back against the uncontrolled use of their vocal identity in AI tools. The issue raises fundamental questions about copyright, compensation, and a creator’s autonomy in the age of generative artificial intelligence — and about who should ultimately control the “voices” of the future.

    He believes that without clearly defined regulations, the number of lawsuits will rise dramatically, because actors are genuinely suffering from this practice.

    There are also potentially dangerous implications for ordinary people, who may become victims of cybercriminals impersonating, for example, a grandchild in a phone call — desperately asking a beloved grandfather for money.

    Related Posts

    News

    The Era of Gemini 3.5 and a Total Search Revolution: Google I/O 2026 Recap

    May 20, 2026
    News

    Jail Time for Hiding Content Origins. South Korea Announces Strict Digital Watermark Law

    May 19, 2026
    News

    Our Brain Tricks Us Into Thinking AI Has No Doubts

    May 18, 2026
    Read more

    The Security Perimeter Is Gone: How Zero Trust Is Changing Corporate Cybersecurity

    May 12, 2026

    IT Worker Migration in 2026. Where Tech Talent Is Moving and Why

    May 8, 2026

    IT Sector as an Economic Stabilizer. Digitally Strong Countries Weather Crises Better

    May 6, 2026
    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram Threads LinkedIn Reddit
    • NEWS
    • ANALYTICS
    • INTERVIEWS
    • ABOUT US
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • EVENTS
    • CONTACT US
    • ©2026 2Digital. All rights reserved.
    • Privacy policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.