Close Menu
    2digital.news2digital.news
    • News
    • Analytics
    • Interviews
    • About us
    • Editorial board
    • Events
    2digital.news2digital.news
    Home»News»Wikipedia Wants Fairness — and Compensation — for the Data That Trained Artificial Intelligence
    News

    Wikipedia Wants Fairness — and Compensation — for the Data That Trained Artificial Intelligence

    Mikolaj LaszkiewiczBy Mikolaj LaszkiewiczNovember 13, 20252 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter Threads Reddit
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn Threads Reddit

    It’s no secret that the “knowledge” behind modern AI tools exists largely thanks to open and free sources like Wikipedia. The Wikimedia Foundation emphasized that the development of large language models (LLMs) would not have been possible without access to open knowledge bases. Data from Wikipedia has been a core component in the training datasets of systems such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot. At the same time, the organization points out that the intense use of its resources by bots and crawlers has significantly increased server loads — with up to 65% of Wikipedia’s web traffic now coming from AI-generated requests.

    Wikimedia is urging AI developers to respect the same principles of openness that they themselves benefit from — by implementing mandatory attribution (clear source citations) and paid licenses that would help sustain projects like Wikipedia. As the Foundation noted in its statement, without reliable, human-curated sources of knowledge, artificial intelligence risks becoming a closed system, endlessly repeating its own errors and trapped in a feedback loop of misinformation.

    The Foundation’s proposal reflects a growing global dispute between content creators and AI companies. Similar actions have already been taken by The New York Times, Reuters, and Axel Springer, which are demanding compensation from companies like OpenAI for using their editorial materials to train generative models.

    However, the case of Wikipedia is fundamentally different — it’s not a profit-driven corporation, but a community of volunteers maintaining an open ecosystem of knowledge. Introducing a compensation model for Wikipedia’s data could therefore set a powerful precedent, forcing other tech companies to rethink how they use the sources that fuel their models.

    If the Wikimedia Foundation succeeds in achieving even part of what it demands, it would mark an important step toward fair cooperation between content creators and the AI industry — which, for now, continues to rely on their work mostly without paying for it. One thing is certain: without access to Wikipedia, every chatbot would lose a huge part of its capabilities.

    Related Posts

    News

    The Era of Gemini 3.5 and a Total Search Revolution: Google I/O 2026 Recap

    May 20, 2026
    News

    Jail Time for Hiding Content Origins. South Korea Announces Strict Digital Watermark Law

    May 19, 2026
    News

    Our Brain Tricks Us Into Thinking AI Has No Doubts

    May 18, 2026
    Read more

    What Is Cloud Computing in Healthcare and How Is It Used?

    May 13, 2026

    The Security Perimeter Is Gone: How Zero Trust Is Changing Corporate Cybersecurity

    May 12, 2026

    IT Worker Migration in 2026. Where Tech Talent Is Moving and Why

    May 8, 2026
    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram Threads LinkedIn Reddit
    • NEWS
    • ANALYTICS
    • INTERVIEWS
    • ABOUT US
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • EVENTS
    • CONTACT US
    • ©2026 2Digital. All rights reserved.
    • Privacy policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.